From:
Alfred Margaryan
“Ligands and Modifiers in Vitreous Materials:
Spectnoscopy of condensed Systems”
Publisher: World Scientific,
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All materials in nature exist
in three states of aggregation: gas,
liquid and solid. Gases can exist as the
usually familiar gas or as plasma (ionized gas); liquids can exist in the form
commonly known as liquid or as liquid crystals; and solids can be amorphous or
have different crystalline forms.
The solid amorphous materials
exist as powder, film, gel, resin and glass form.
The basic form of an
amorphous state is the glass forming state for inorganic materials, and resin
forming for organic materials.
Materials in the glass
forming or vitreous state are solid, homogeneous, fragile and transparent
matter. The glass forming state is
located between the crystalline and liquid state.
All materials in the glass
forming state have some general physico-chemical
characteristics. Typical glass forming
subjects are:
1. Isotrop; which means that all properties are same on all
sides of matter.
2. Glasses during heat process do not melt as crystals,
but gradually soften and pass from fragile to a high viscosity and liquid state
(Figure 1.1). In this process all physico-chemical properties are changed uninterrupted.
|
|
Figure 1.1: Nature of
cooling of the melts crystalline (curve 1), and glass forming (curve 2)
materials.
3. Glasses melts and solidify in
reverse (Figure 1.1), which means that repeated process of melting and cooling
of glass takes the same temperature regime.
Reverse process of properties
indicates, that glass forming melts and solid glasses are true liquids, therefore
the solid glass state is supercooled liquid.
Special scientific interest
must be presented for evaluation of the glass forming process by from point the
perspective of view of the nature of the chemical bonds, which are formed
between individual elements of the structure.
The nature of the chemical
bonds is one of the dominant factors in the glass forming process. However, in scientific literature there are
few publications on this subject.
The investigation of chemical
bonds in glass forming melt and in the solid glass are one of the general
problems of the material sciences, especially for glass forming materials
[1-9].
Winter-Klein [10-12]
recommended the replace conception about glass forming elements by the
conception of the glass forming bonds, accomplished by P-electrons.
Britton [13] and Rawson [14]
established that for glass formation the first factor is the nature of the
chemical bonds between particles of existing cells. Glass forming is made possible by the
presence of a variety of mixed bonds ionic-covalency.
Dietzel [15] determined the position of glass forming oxides
in the group of existing oxides and showed dependence of the melting points of
some oxides at strength of the fields as Z/a2 (Z-charge, a-distance
of center between both ions). This
dependence is presented on Figure 1.2.
It shows the curve passed through fields of oxides, which have high
melting point (2000-3000°C). These types of oxides have a
predominantly ionic bond.
After the curve passes
through the field of glass forming oxides (SiO2, GeO2, B2O3,
P2O5) the end of the curve lies down in the field of
oxides having very low melting point (0-400°C) which is characterized with covalence bonds. In glass forming oxides there are
intermediate types of ionic-covalent bonds.
|
|
Figure 1.2: Melting
points of some oxides function at strength of cations
fields Z/a2 (after
ref. [15]).
In the glass forming or
vitreous state there is a large quantities of
inorganic materials, from individual elements to complicated multicomponent systems.
Inorganic glasses are
classified by several types:
1. Elementary or monoatomic
glass, which consists of one base element (S, Se, As, P).
2. Oxide glass where typical glass forming components are
B2O3, SiO2, GeO2, P2O5. Other oxides become to glassy state in small
quantities under fast cooling conditions (As2O3, Sb2O3,
TeO2, V2O5). Some oxides cannot become to vitreous form
independently (A12O3, Ga2O3, Bi2O3,
TiO2, MoO3, WO3),
however in combination with different components in binary and multicomponent systems develop glass-forming abilities.
Finally
we have the types of silicate, borax, phosphate, germanate,
tellurate, aluminate and
other oxide glasses.
3. Halide glass [16] on base BeF2,
ZnF2, ZrF4, HfF4, InF4 with a
combination of fluorides MeF, MeF2, MeF3
is named fluoride glass [17].
From chlorides in glass
forming states we have a lot of data regarding the physico-chemical
properties of Zinc chlorides (ZnCl2).
There is some interest in
glass systems MeFn-HF, where the glass
forming component is HF.
4. Chalcogan types of
glass are formed on the basis of sulphides, selenides and tellurides. Glass forming elements in these types of
systems are S, Se, and Te.
In binary systems, general
glass forming components are selenides of arsenic,
germanium, and phosphorus (As2Se3, GeSe2, P2Se3) and sulphides
of arsenic As2S3 and germanium GeS2.
In general, chalcogan glass is very complex and different in
composition.
5. Special types of glass, such as groups of nitrate,
acetate and sulphate glasses have low melting
points. These types of glass are
chemically unstable.
6. A mixed type of glass formed by using a mix of
previously glass formed components:
oxides and Halides, oxides and chalcogans, chalcogans and halides.
Particular types of glass are
nitride and oxide-nitride glasses on the base Si3N4
(MP-1900°C), AlN
(MP-2200°C), BN (MP-3000°C), Be3N2 (MP-2200°C) [19]. These
types of glasses are absolutely new. They have a very high chemical resistance
and a high melting point.
In recent years we are
finding in scientific literature some results about metallic glass (Fe, Pd, Zr, Ni, Cu) [20-22].
Petrovski [23,34] after conclusion of all presentations on
glass forming states showed on the sample of beryllium fluorine glasses that
covalence bonds favorable for glass forming, but ionic bonds for
crystallization.
Generally the glass forming
state of materials depend on the existence of mixed types of bonds
ionic-covalence characters between elements of structure.
Spectroscopic investigation
of transition elements in glass forming and crystalline materials are giving us
the opportunity to evaluate the change of degree of covalency
and strength of ligands field in above matrices.
In fundamental works Bethe [25] and Van Vleck [26-29]
successfully developed the theory of crystalline field regarding crystalline
materials.
The second period development
of theory on crystalline field begins with the progress of spectrophotometry
and electron paramagnetic resonance [30-35].
During this period the theory
of fields of ligands was formed, it combined the
theory of crystalline fields with the Mulliken [36]
method of molecular orbitals.
Consequently, positive
results of the theory of chemical bonding and the theory of crystalline fields
were included in theory field of ligands.
One of the successful results
of theory field of ligands are energetic diagram
types of Tanabe-Sugano [37,83]. These diagram types are presenting the
influence of the nature of ligands on the parameters
of crystalline fields (spectrochemical and nephelauxetic lines) [39-43]. Margaryan et al.
[44-47] showed that in vitreous materials the following chemical bonds exist
between D-L-G-L-M, where D-dopant (ions of transition
elements dn, ¦n), L-ligand, G-glass forming atom near coordination sphere,
M-modifier.
In the degree of covalency of L-G is higher (O-Si,
O-Ge, O-B, O-P or F-Be) the degree of covalency between D-L (L-dn
or L-¦n) will be lower.
The differences in covalency are described by
the changes in the polarization of the ligands.
In glass forming (vitreous),
the material elements of structure (L-G) have to be predominantly in covalent
bonding, owing to spn-hybridization of
electron orbitals between the glass forming atom (G)
and ligand (L).
The opposite occurs in the crystalline form of matter.
Allen and Nebert
[48,49] discovered that the EPR spectra of transition metals, in particular Mn(II), within organic and inorganic solvents show finer
structures when the sample is in the glass forming phase rather than a
polycrystalline phase. Figures 1.3 and
1.4 show the EPR spectra of Mn(II) in methanol (CH3OH) and 12N HCl. The hyperfine
structure becomes quite different when the sample changes from a transparent
glass phase (curve 1) to a polycrystalline phase (curve 2).
|
|
Figure 1.3: EPR spectra
of Mn(II)
in vitreous (curve 1) and polycrystalline (curve 2)
methanol (after ref. [48]).
|
|
Figure 1.4: EPR spectra
of Mn(II)
in vitreous (curve 1) and polycrystalline (curve 2) 12N
HCl (after ref. [48]).
Margaryan et al. [50-58] investigated the EPR spectra of the
paramagnetic Mn(II) ion in glass forming and crystalline (hexagonal form)
germanium dioxide. The compositions of
glass forming-dopant and crystal-dopant
have a significant importance in determining the structure and character of
bonds in vitreous-glassy (isotropic) and crystalline (anisotropic)
systems. The important parameters
are: the degree of covalency
in Ge02 of the electron orbitals of Mn(II)
and ligands, the field intensity of the ligands, the coordination position of Mn(II),
regularity of the structure of Ge02 in the vitreous and crystalline
states.
Figure 1.5 shows EPR spectra Mn(II) in
vitreous (curves 1 and 2) and crystalline (curves 3 and 4) Ge02. Any change in the solvate cloud will lead to
some difference in the EPR spectra of Mn(II) (see Figure 1.5).
|
|
Figure 1.5: EPR spectra
of Mn(II)
in vitreous (curves 1 and 2) and crystalline (hexagonal
forms) (curves 3 and 4) Ge02 (after refs. [50,51]).
An important role is played
by the proportion of one or another type of bonding existing between the ligand and glassformer ions
(L-G), and the ligand and dopant
ions (L-D) in the structures.
A comparison of the EPR
spectra Mn(II)
in vitreous (curves 1 and 2) and crystalline (curves 3 and 4) germanium dioxide
(Figure 1.5) shows identical data in [48,49] (Figures 1.3 and 1.4).
From the EPR data for Mn(II),
we can conclude that the degree of hyperfine splitting (hfs) in a covalent ligand-dopant interaction is lower than that in an ionic
bond. The hyperfine splitting for Mn(II) is
directly proportional to the degree of ionic bonding in the ligand-dopant
bond [50-52].
Previous interpretations
received their confirmation for vitreous and crystalline form of
fluorophosphates type of 45P2O5.55BaF2 (in mol%), when investigated EPR spectra of Mn(II)
respectively [54].
Figure 1.6 illustrates EPR
spectra of Mn(II) in vitreous(curves 1 and 2) and crystalline (curves 3
and 4) form of fluorophosphates. It
shows significant difference in spectra EPR and means of hyperfine splitting (hfs). Constant of hyperfine splitting for vitreous fluorophosphate (curves 1 and 2) equals to 94.33oe in
crystalline form of the same composition (curves 3 and 4) A=89.98oe (Figure
1.6)
|
|
Figure 1.6: EPR spectra
of Mn(II)
in glasses of composition (mol%): 45P2O5.55BaF2;
Mn(II)
0.05 wt% (curve 1), 0.1 wt% (curve 2), and in their
crystalline forms; Mn(II) 0.05 wt% (curve 3), 0.1 wt% (curve 4) (after ref.
[54]).
Figure 1.6 shows that
strength of the ligand field on Mn(II) in crystallized
samples are significantly higher than in glass.
These types of bonds, ligand-Mn(II) in glass forming and crystalline phases, have a
different means of covalency. Under the crystallizing processing of glass
the bond of covalency between ligand-Mn(II) is increases (A=89.98oe,
Figure 1.6).
Margaryan et al. [44-47] show that the similarity of chemical
bonds between ligands and dopants
(L-D) in the different natures of glasses (berylliumfluorine,
fluorophosphate, phosphate, silicate, germanate, borax and others) causes an analogy in their spectrochemical and spectroscopic parameters; even though
they have the crystallochemist similarities of some
other glass-formers (BeF2, Si02, Ge02).
Authors [45,46]
demonstrated that closest bonds of ligand-dopant in
the berylliumfluorine, fluorophosphate
and phosphate glasses are the main reasons for their similarity in spectral
properties, although the nature of glass from a crystallochemical
point of view are different (BeF2 and P205).
Spectrochemical parameters Racha B and C, nephelauxetic relation b=B/B0,
positions of levels of 4T1g (G) and 4T2g
(G) of transition elements in vitreous and crystalline phases giving us an
opportunity to evaluate the changes of covalency and
strength of ligand fields in the showing matters.
The electron spectra of
absorption Mn(II) in minerals and glasses are useful for the expressive
bands of transitions 6Alg (S) ® 4Eg (G) and 6A1g
(S) ® 4Eg
(D) can be used for correct calculations of electrostatic parameters Racha B and C from equation Tanae-Sugano
[37,38]:
6A1g (S) ® 4Eg (G) = 10B+5C
6A1g (S) ® 4Eg (D) = 17B+5C
Racha parameter B evaluated interelectronic
interaction of matrices with the electron orbitals of
the dn transition
elements.
Introduction of Mn(II)
ion in glass or other matrices leads to the decrease of Racha
parameter B. Value of B in glass is
reduced to 600 cm-1, compared with 860 cm-1 for free ions
of manganese (B0). From this
fact we can conclude that in glass forming materials there exists
a high degree of covalency between dopant and ligands [44].
Racha parameter B and nephelauxetic
relation (b=B/Bo) is a measure of bond of covalency ligand-dopant.
The covalency
increases when the values of B and b are reduced
[59-61].
Table 1.1 demonstrates
spectroscopic parameters for manganese minerals and glasses, and also counts
parameters for B and b=B/Bo [62].
Table 1.1 shows that most of
the low covalency between ligand-dopant
observed for monocrystal MnF2, where B=721
cm-1, b=84% and berylliumfluorine
glasses, where B=693 cm-1, b=80%.
High covalency
between ligand-Mn(II) appears in Mn2Si04 when B=577 cm-1
and b=67%; and silicate glasses when B=600 cm-1
and b=69%.
Table 1.1
Some Spectroscopic Parameters of
Manganese Minerals and Glasses (from [62])
|
Matrices |
6S ® 4G |
6S ® 4D |
Racha B cm-1 |
b=B/B0% |
|
MnF2 from [63] |
25180 |
30230 |
721 |
84 |
|
MnSO4.H2O from [59] |
25000 |
29580 |
693 |
80 |
|
LiMnPO4 from [59] |
24870 |
29580 |
673 |
78 |
|
MnCO3 from [59] |
24750 |
29200 |
636 |
74 |
|
CaMnSiO4 from [59] |
24450 |
28570 |
588 |
68 |
|
Mn2SiO4 from [59] |
24630 |
28670 |
577 |
67 |
|
Berylliumfluorine glass from [46,64] |
25200 |
30050 |
693 |
80 |
|
Fluorophosphate glass from [65] |
24320 |
28730 |
630 |
73 |
|
Germaniumfluoro-phosphate glass from [66] |
24100 |
28500 |
628 |
73 |
|
Germaniumphosphate glass from [66] |
24000 |
28350 |
621 |
72 |
|
Borax glass from [66] |
24300 |
28650 |
621 |
72 |
|
Germaniumoxifluorine glass from [66] |
23800 |
28100 |
614 |
71 |
|
Phosphate glass from [67] |
24580 |
28850 |
610 |
71 |
|
Silicate glass from [67] |
23800 |
28000 |
600 |
69 |
|
Germanate glass from [66] |
23400 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
According to the data of Margaryan [62,66] Figure 1.7
presents the energetic levels of the 6A1g (S) ® 4T1g (G) band and regular
growth of covalency ligand-Mn(II)
in some manganese minerals and glasses.
|
|
Figure 1.7: Position of 4T1g
(G) band in manganese minerals and glasses (after refs. [62,66]).
Therefore, the estimated
degree of covalency or ionicity
between dn-electrons and ligands in crystalline, glass forming and liquid matrices
it is possible to use the data of Racha parameter B, nephelauxetic relation (b=B/Bo)
and the position of transition 4T1g (G) and 4T2g
(G) levels.
Covalency of the ligand-Mn(II) is increasing in the line of glasses: Berylliumfluorine (4T1g
=21150 cm-1), fluorophosphate (borax) (4T1g=20000
cm-1), phosphate (4T1g =19850 cm-1),
germaniumfluorophosphate (4T1g=19200
cm-1), germaniumphosphate (4T1g
=19150 cm-1), germaniumoxifluorate (4T1g=19000
cm-1), silicate (4T1g=15450 cm-1).
Amosov et. al
[68] studied optical spectra of absorption of Co(II) in crystalline quartz (Si02)
and the vitreous form of silicon dioxide (Si02) (Figure 1.8).
|
|
Figure 1.8: Co(II) absorption spectra in crystalline quartz (curve 1),
and glass forming silica
(curve 2) (after
ref. [8]).
Spectra of absorption of the Co(II) consists of two maximums 7000 and 17000 cm-1. The band 7000 cm-1 allows three
maximums: in crystalline quartz is 7700,
6700 and 5700 cm-1, and in the quartz glass is 8000, 6300 and 5300
cm-1. In the visible parts of
the spectra near 17000 cm-1 exist hyperfine structures also.
The spectra of absorption of
the Co(II) in crystalline quartz allows three
maximums: 18500, 17100 and 15600 cm-1
and in the quartz glass: 19700, 16500 and 14500cm-1.
Therefore the rate of
splitting in the quartz glass increases almost twice. The intensity of
absorption of Co(II) in the quartz glass is
significantly higher than in crystalline quartz.
At the time of transition
from quartz glass to crystalline quartz the rate of splitting of bands
increases. This fact is attributed to
the nature of chemical bonds between Co(II) and ligands (oxygen) in crystalline, and vitreous forms of Si02.
These results are also confirmed
when we compare the electrostatic parameter Racha B
in crystalline and glass forming Si02. The parameter of Racha
B depends on nature of the chemical bonds ligand-dopant
and may be determined by using optical spectra of absorption of Co(II) for each concrete matters [69]. For Co(II) in
crystalline quartz the rate of B=864 cm-1, and respectively for
quartz glass B=884 cm-1 [68].
Ebendorff-Heidepriem and Ehrt [70] studied the
relationships between local structure of rare earth doped fluoride phosphate
and phosphate glasses and the spectroscopic properties of Eu(III) and Tb(III) ions.
The nephelauxetic
shift of Tb(III) and Eu(III)
f ® d absorption bands are
used to measure the covalency difference between of
rare earth ions and ligands. The differences in covalency
are ascribed to changes in the polarizability of the ligands.
With increasing phosphate
content the covalency between rare earth ions and
surrounding ligands increases due to the substitution of fluorine ions by oxygen ions having higher
electron polarizability. In fluoride phosphate glasses, the diphosphate groups dominate the spectroscopic properties of
the rare earth ions [71].
Formulation of the scientific
and experimental bases of evaluation on the nature of chemical bonds, created
by ligands, modifiers, and dopants
on the vitreous phase, and their influence on the spectrochemical
and spectroscopic parameters of glasses have both an important scientific and
practical interest in connection with the interpretation of the dynamics of the
glass forming state and the development of sensitized and controllable lasers,
as well as the creation of the wide type of amplifiers on the base of inorganic
glass.